Fair Proxy Web

Kenyan rivals hold ‘ice-breaker’ talks

NAIROBI, Kenya (CNN) — Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki and opposition leader Raila Odinga met Thursday for the first time since last month’s bitterly disputed election, under the auspices of former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

Today, we have taken the first vital steps in resolving the electoral dispute and conflict that has ravaged this country for nearly a month now, said Odinga, who shook hands with Kibaki following Thursday’s meeting.

Government officials told CNN they are not willing to negotiate the legitimacy of Kibaki’s presidency — which is at the center of the electoral dispute — and said that the opposition must take up that issue with Kenya’s courts.

That position was reiterated by Kibaki’s brief statement following his meeting with Odinga: After being sworn in as your duly elected president of Kenya, I will personally lead our country in promoting unity, tolerance, peace, and harmony among Kenyans.

The one-hour meeting was intended to break the ice, Kenya’s Foreign Minister Moses Wetangula had said earlier.

The three men were alone in the room, without any aides, in an effort to show we support genuine dialogue, Wetangula said.

Annan arrived in Kenya on Tuesday to help resolve the dispute that has resulted in widespread ethnic violence, although some say tensions had been simmering long before the December 27 vote.

More than 500 people have been killed in the violence that followed the election in which Kibaki kept his post.

Odinga, the Orange Democratic Movement candidate for president, and his supporters claim the election was rigged, and international observers noted some irregularities in the voting.

After the vote, supporters of Kibaki, a member of the Kikuyu tribe, battled with supporters of Odinga, a member of the Luo tribe, in bloody street fights that often involved machetes.
found here.

Gates: Troops could go to Pakistan

WASHINGTON (CNN) — U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said Thursday that the United States is ready, able and willing to send troops to Pakistan if the government of the South Asian nation is interested.

U.S. military officials have told CNN that commanders are reviewing a classified planning order that could result in troops going to Pakistan for training purposes if Pakistan’s government approves.

The announcement comes as Pakistan’s government faces what Gates called increased efforts by al Qaeda.

Musharraf and other Pakistani leaders, however, have repeatedly said it is their military — not that of the United States — that will fight elements of al Qaeda and the Taliban that are believed to live and train in the mountainous region of Pakistan that borders Afghanistan.

It’s obviously been a subject of ongoing dialogue, Gates said. Pakistan is a sovereign country; they clearly have the right to decide whether or not forces from another country are going to operate on their soil.

We will continue the dialogue, but we would not do anything without their approval.

Analysts say the visible presence of U.S. troops — particularly a large ground force — could provoke anti-American sentiment among many Pakistanis.

The presence of U.S. forces in Pakistan would be hugely inflammatory for the rest of the country and probably would destabilize Pakistan in a more serious way than it is right now, said Frederick Barton of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank. So, clearly, training is the best thing we can do.

Pakistani opposition leader Imran Khan, in comments to CNN International, predicted that a heavy U.S. military presence in the tribal areas along the Pakistan-Afghan border would make the situation worse, not better.

If the U.S. sends its troops into the tribal areas, it will be a bigger quagmire than Iraq, said Khan, a former cricket star seeking the nation’s presidency. It will be the biggest disaster U.S. could commit.

Khan, who is harshly critical of Musharraf, said the president has finally begun engaging tribal leaders in the area in an attempt to isolate al Qaeda and other terror groups — an effort he says a U.S. presence would harm.

Winning the tribal people over to your side is not (done) by using helicopter gunships and bombing the villages where innocent people are dying … you’re actually pushing them in the other direction, Khan said. People who understand the tribal area would never think of such a policy.

Gates said that if a training plan went through, it likely would involve a very small number of U.S. troops.

The cost of any new training program would be in addition to the $750 million in security and economic aide the United States provides to the country.

Pakistan is considered an ally in the war against al Qaeda and the Taliban, despite concerns among some about Musharraf’s humanitarian record and level of dedication to stamping out extremists.

Musharraf placed the country under a six-week state of emergency late last year, during which he ousted most of the Supreme Court justices who had been expected to nullify his recent election victory on constitutional grounds. A former leader of Pakistan’s military, Musharraf seized power in a bloodless coup in 1999.

Gates said al Qaeda has increased its activity in Pakistan and begun partnering with other extremist groups in the nation — a situation that threatens not just the country or region, but the whole world.

It would be unreasonable to assume that all of the planning they’re doing is focused strictly on Pakistan, he said. I think that it’s a continued threat to Europe as well as to us.
found here.